|
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?
|
|
12-13-2012, 06:00 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?
Like the list vertcies 1,4, 7, 9 to 1, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13 So that IDs of hexagon verts might also get included before threshhold is reached and its just says 7 vertices selected. I would like to puch the limit up from < 5 to < 7 I'm suspicous that this was picked somewhat arbitrarily. If this would be annoying ... maybe I could make it a preference. I have bumped it up for myself and a fabricator who needs to interograte the model sometimes and uses this as a debugging tool. I just wanted to ask first rather than just do a pull-request for change. I can always patch this later. In real work apps ... Hexagons are common in nature and both hexagons and pentagons appear in any number of natural "FOAMS". I don't think the same is true for higher order polygons so much. I think the hexagon is at least arguabbly a good cut off. I personally think quads is not so great a cut-off. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ? - ggaliens - 12-13-2012 06:00 PM
RE: Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ? - optigon - 12-15-2012, 03:39 AM
RE: Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ? - dereksergio - 05-10-2013, 05:01 AM
RE: Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ? - ggaliens - 05-10-2013, 12:36 PM
RE: Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ? - Geta-Ve - 05-11-2013, 02:23 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



