|
YafaRay Plug-in - reviewing for Yafaray 3.0
|
|
07-21-2016, 01:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-21-2016 02:22 PM by david.bluecame.)
Post: #45
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: YafaRay Plug-in - reviewing for Yafaray 3.0
Hello,
With the "individual items" code I got Render Passes working :-) (although it requires some changes I made to Core that will be available in the upcoming YafaRay v3.0.1-beta) I will try later Micheus' latest changes to optimize the code. Some examples :-) Combined pass (typical pass as you know it) ![]() Z-depth pass: ![]() Debug pass - Normals ![]() Direct diffuse only pass ![]() Indirect light pass: ![]() Refraction pass: ![]() Reflection pass: ![]() Hello, Micheus. When I tried your latest code I initially got this during compilation: erlc -Werror -pa ../../ebin -pa ../../intl_tools -I ../../intl_tools -I ../../src -I ../../e3d +debug_info -o../../plugins/import_export wpc_yafaray.erl wpc_yafaray.erl:2198: syntax error before: '}' wpc_yafaray.erl:2190: function export_prefs/0 undefined I found an extra "}" in the line Acc++[list_to_atom(Id),?DEF_RENDER_PASS}] So I changed it to: Acc++[list_to_atom(Id),?DEF_RENDER_PASS] It compiles but then I get this error in runtime when I try to enter the Render->YafaRay window: wpc_yafaray:command/3: bad return value: {'EXIT', {badarg, [{erlang,list_to_atom, [[114,101,110,100,101,114,95,112, 97,115|...]], []}, {wpc_yafaray, '-export_prefs/0-fun-0-',2, [{file,"wpc_yafaray.erl"}, {line,2198}]}, {lists,foldl,3, [{file,"lists.erl"},{line,1262}]}, {wpc_yafaray,export_prefs,0, [{file,"wpc_yafaray.erl"}, {line,2196}]}, {wpc_yafaray,export_dialog,2, [{file,"wpc_yafaray.erl"}, {line,2190}]}, {wings_develop,time_command,2, [{file,"wings_develop.erl"}, {line,81}]}, {wings_plugin,command,3, [{file,"wings_plugin.erl"}, {line,139}]}, {wings,raw_command_1,3, [{file,[...]},{line,...}]}]}} I agree it's much nicer and good practice to do this as an array, with much more compact and scalable code. However, it's too much effort I think, and as it's already working with the "independent" items code I would suggest to keep it that way. If the multiple defines are not needed, can I just use the same for all the render_passXX atoms? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)










