Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Share Thread:
Reddit Facebook Twitter
Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
03-26-2013, 01:45 AM
Post: #1
Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?

Bjorn's 1.5.x version from snaphot thread distributed in .dmg form ?

If so ... can you tell me you system specs and OS Version ?

Maybe it does not run so well under Moutain Lion ?
Reply
04-01-2013, 01:54 PM
Post: #2
RE: Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
(03-26-2013 01:45 AM)ggaliens Wrote:  Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?

Bjorn's 1.5.x version from snaphot thread distributed in .dmg form ?

If so ... can you tell me you system specs and OS Version ?

Maybe it does not run so well under Moutain Lion ?
Hi! ggaliens

My main enviroment is OSX 10.8.3 (Mac mini 2009)
CPU : Intel Core 2Duo 2Ghz
Memory: DDR3 1067MHZ 2GB
Graophics NVIDIA GeForce 9400 256MB

Wings3D: v1.5Pre1.75.g8471(pu) from snapshot thread
(Is this the latest version for OSX?)

These issues have occurred in my environment.
* Blurred UI Fonts ( It does not happen with Wings3D v1.4.1 on OSX10.7. )
*In "Primitive> Image Plane..." command, The preview dialog is missing.
(If correct it will preview dialog for the direction in which the textures.)

tkbd
Reply
04-01-2013, 03:06 PM
Post: #3
RE: Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
ggaliens, it seems there are only you two using Wings on OSX in accord with that poll I started: What OS you installed Wings3D
As well there are a few people using 1.5pre.

It would be very useful people answer those polls.
Reply
04-01-2013, 04:05 PM
Post: #4
RE: Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
Micheus ... the poll is not well attended.

I know of many Mac OS X users ... not just two or a few.
Reply
04-02-2013, 11:20 PM
Post: #5
RE: Anyone running latest Snaphot in OS X ?
(04-01-2013 01:54 PM)tkbd Wrote:  *In "Primitive> Image Plane..." command, The preview dialog is missing.
(If correct it will preview dialog for the direction in which the textures.)
That was a bug. It's fixed now.
Thanks
Reply


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)