02-08-2015, 04:20 AM
I had no doubts. The Problem has not been "addressed".
If a developer wants to "INSERT" a new function ... and said function BELONGS in the middle of a sequnce that is already "PACKED" with respect to the string numbers used ... it seems at this new time and place ... numbers must either (a) be resequenced ... or (b) be out of order.
1
2
3
4 Some old function
100 My new function
5 Some other old function
6
7
8
9
Might have been better to have used floating point or outline style numbers like
1.2.3.1
Meh. Just not sure what I'm supposed to do ... that's all.
If a developer wants to "INSERT" a new function ... and said function BELONGS in the middle of a sequnce that is already "PACKED" with respect to the string numbers used ... it seems at this new time and place ... numbers must either (a) be resequenced ... or (b) be out of order.
1
2
3
4 Some old function
100 My new function
5 Some other old function
6
7
8
9
Might have been better to have used floating point or outline style numbers like
1.2.3.1
Meh. Just not sure what I'm supposed to do ... that's all.